Utah State
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
173  Kashley Carter FR 20:14
491  Jaqueline Winterton JR 20:54
520  Kelsey Yamauchi SO 20:57
544  Tori Parkinson JR 20:58
953  Hannah Malone SO 21:31
1,036  Jacqueline Heaps SO 21:37
1,151  Caroline Weiler SO 21:46
1,163  Lauren Pierson FR 21:47
1,429  Amanda Stoudt SR 22:04
1,862  Shannon Maloney FR 22:33
National Rank #84 of 339
Mountain Region Rank #10 of 20
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.1%
Most Likely Finish 10th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.1%
Top 10 in Regional 77.8%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Kashley Carter Jaqueline Winterton Kelsey Yamauchi Tori Parkinson Hannah Malone Jacqueline Heaps Caroline Weiler Lauren Pierson Amanda Stoudt Shannon Maloney
Roy Griak Invitational 09/26 955 20:10 20:58 20:50 21:01 22:04 21:39 21:15 21:27 23:08
D1 Pre-Nationals (Red) 10/17 928 19:58 20:55 21:01 21:02 21:03 21:55 21:37
Mountain West Championships 10/30 950 20:07 20:43 20:56 21:13 21:41 21:27 22:54 22:05
Mountain Region Championships 11/13 1100 21:21 21:02 21:03 20:46 21:27 21:56 23:47





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.1% 28.6 710 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Region Championship 100% 9.8 288 0.1 0.4 1.7 7.2 32.9 35.5 15.8 4.5 1.3 0.4 0.2 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Kashley Carter 23.2% 112.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
Jaqueline Winterton 0.1% 173.5
Kelsey Yamauchi 0.1% 203.0
Tori Parkinson 0.1% 192.5
Hannah Malone 0.1% 237.5
Jacqueline Heaps 0.1% 243.5
Caroline Weiler 0.1% 250.3


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Kashley Carter 26.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.6 2.0 2.4 2.8 3.4 3.0 3.5 3.7 4.2 3.5 3.0 3.9 4.1
Jaqueline Winterton 56.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1
Kelsey Yamauchi 59.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1
Tori Parkinson 61.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Hannah Malone 86.3
Jacqueline Heaps 91.3
Caroline Weiler 98.7




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 0.1% 33.3% 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 5
6 0.4% 5.0% 0.0 0.4 0.0 6
7 1.7% 1.2% 0.0 1.7 0.0 7
8 7.2% 7.2 8
9 32.9% 0.1% 0.0 32.8 0.0 9
10 35.5% 35.5 10
11 15.8% 15.8 11
12 4.5% 4.5 12
13 1.3% 1.3 13
14 0.4% 0.4 14
15 0.2% 0.2 15
16 16
17 0.0% 0.0 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
Total 100% 0.1% 0.0 0.0 0.0 99.9 0.0 0.1




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Texas 43.8% 1.0 0.4
Stephen F. Austin 9.1% 1.0 0.1
Rice 5.9% 1.0 0.1
Oklahoma 2.3% 1.0 0.0
Florida 1.7% 1.0 0.0
Missouri 0.3% 1.0 0.0
San Francisco 0.2% 1.0 0.0
Connecticut 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.6
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 3.0